<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2381" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2381</id>
  <updated>2026-06-26T09:25:21Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-26T09:25:21Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>An Assessment Of Emerging Forms Of Technological Innovations In Justice Delivery Mechanism</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2383" />
    <author>
      <name>Chakravarthy, Gunnu Anupama</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2383</id>
    <updated>2025-01-23T08:55:27Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: An Assessment Of Emerging Forms Of Technological Innovations In Justice Delivery Mechanism
Authors: Chakravarthy, Gunnu Anupama
Abstract: This article aims to examine how technological progress&#xD;
and implementation have affected and been affected by&#xD;
the legal system. Technology has the potential to&#xD;
transform the justice system, increase access to justice,&#xD;
and de-mystify legal institutions all while assisting&#xD;
citizens with legal work. Opportunities for innovation in&#xD;
the field of justice generate a number of challenges,&#xD;
particularly those associated with the so-called "digital&#xD;
divide." Among these include worries about privacy,&#xD;
security, and secrecy, as well as problems with&#xD;
accessibility and the ethical dilemmas posed by the&#xD;
dehumanisation of judicial processes. During the&#xD;
COVID-19 pandemic, a number of courts around the&#xD;
globe responded by supporting remote hearings and&#xD;
online case management approaches. Judicial responses&#xD;
to COVID-19 have been partly dependent on the court&#xD;
system readiness to adopt or adapt technologies. Some&#xD;
courts successfully transitioned judicial activities to&#xD;
support remote access arrangements, largely because&#xD;
the basic infrastructure existed to enable the transition.&#xD;
Despite some reservations around replacement and&#xD;
disruptive technologies, supportive technologies have&#xD;
potential to pave the way for positive developments in the&#xD;
justice sector.The article aims to explore, the different forms of Justice&#xD;
Innovation that are supportive, replacement and&#xD;
disruptive technologies. It also analyses the shifts during&#xD;
COVID-19 that included a rapid uptake in supportive&#xD;
and replacement technology to support remote access arrangements. Justice applications, or mobile and web-&#xD;
based programmes, are analysed for their function in&#xD;
helping people with legal chores, reshaping the justice&#xD;
system, increasing access to justice, and reducing the&#xD;
mystique surrounding the legal system.
Description: NALSAR Law Review&#xD;
Viol. 8, No.-2 ,2023</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Exploring The Significance Of ‘Right To Be Forgotten’ &amp; Intricacies of Safeguarding Personal Data In Digital Era: An Analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2382" />
    <author>
      <name>Sisodia, Ana</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2382</id>
    <updated>2025-01-23T08:44:15Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Exploring The Significance Of ‘Right To Be Forgotten’ &amp; Intricacies of Safeguarding Personal Data In Digital Era: An Analysis
Authors: Sisodia, Ana
Abstract: Humans are viewed as independent entities with an&#xD;
innate demand for privacy and control over particular&#xD;
parts of their lives. Since we live in a time where our&#xD;
personal data are available online or in public forums,&#xD;
therefore, it is crucial for everyone to safeguard it. The&#xD;
case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India1 put&#xD;
the debate in India on data protection and privacy into&#xD;
perspective when the Supreme Court declared the right&#xD;
to privacy to be a basic right as a part and parcel of&#xD;
Right to Life and Personal Liberty, since, India, the&#xD;
world’s largest Democracy has provided through lex&#xD;
loci some inseparable Fundamental rights which are&#xD;
said to be sine qua non for harmonious existence. As a&#xD;
result of which, Standing and Parliamentary Committees&#xD;
also underlined in their reports the necessity for specific&#xD;
data protection and privacy laws. After a considerable&#xD;
hustle and on the basis of Justice B.N Srikrishna report,&#xD;
the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 was tabled in&#xD;
the Parliament which specifically provided for ‘Right to&#xD;
be Forgotten’. However, the bill was withdrawn and now&#xD;
replaced by altogether different Digital Personal Data&#xD;
Protection Bill, 2022, which does not specifically&#xD;
provides for Right to be Forgotten. The Paper is an&#xD;
attempt to analyse the importance, needs and challenges&#xD;
associated with Right to be forgotten having orientation&#xD;
to the current trends, with special reference to Right to&#xD;
Privacy.
Description: NALSAR Law Revies&#xD;
VOL- 8, NO.2 , 2023</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

